Difference between revisions of "Parity"

From Boolean Zoo
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
==Properties==
 
==Properties==
 
* Parity only depends on the number of ones and is therefore a [[Symmetric function|symmetric Boolean function]].
 
* Parity only depends on the number of ones and is therefore a [[Symmetric function|symmetric Boolean function]].
* The [[decision tree complexity]] of the tribes function is <math>D(f)=n</math>.
+
* The [[decision tree complexity]] of the parity function is <math>D(f)=n</math>.
 
* Over <math>\{-1,1\}</math>, the representation of the parity function is exactly the monomial <math>x_1 x_2 \ldots x_n</math>. Thus all of its Fourier mass rests on the highest level.
 
* Over <math>\{-1,1\}</math>, the representation of the parity function is exactly the monomial <math>x_1 x_2 \ldots x_n</math>. Thus all of its Fourier mass rests on the highest level.
 
* The ''n''-variable parity function and its negation are the only Boolean functions for which all [[disjunctive normal form]]s have the maximal number of 2<sup>&nbsp;''n''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1</sup> monomials of length ''n'' and all [[conjunctive normal form]]s have  the maximal number of 2<sup>&nbsp;''n''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1</sup> clauses of length ''n''. <ref> [[Ingo Wegener]], Randall J. Pruim, ''Complexity Theory'', 2005, {{isbn|3-540-21045-8}}, [https://books.google.com/books?id=u7DZSDSUYlQC&pg=PA261&lpg=PA261&dq=%22parity+function%22+H%C3%A5stad&source=bl&ots=HNQ-Jx67yy&sig=qOg_lAiE3JbqsDdQO0rrmgxJmDs&hl=en&ei=U9PjSfGYDYjaswOCkNysCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3#PPA260,M1 p. 260]</ref>
 
* The ''n''-variable parity function and its negation are the only Boolean functions for which all [[disjunctive normal form]]s have the maximal number of 2<sup>&nbsp;''n''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1</sup> monomials of length ''n'' and all [[conjunctive normal form]]s have  the maximal number of 2<sup>&nbsp;''n''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;1</sup> clauses of length ''n''. <ref> [[Ingo Wegener]], Randall J. Pruim, ''Complexity Theory'', 2005, {{isbn|3-540-21045-8}}, [https://books.google.com/books?id=u7DZSDSUYlQC&pg=PA261&lpg=PA261&dq=%22parity+function%22+H%C3%A5stad&source=bl&ots=HNQ-Jx67yy&sig=qOg_lAiE3JbqsDdQO0rrmgxJmDs&hl=en&ei=U9PjSfGYDYjaswOCkNysCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3#PPA260,M1 p. 260]</ref>
Line 17: Line 17:
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
[[Category:symmetric function]] [[Category:balanced function]] [[Category:even function]] [[Category:odd function]] [[Category:Noise sensitive function]]
+
[[Category:symmetric function]] [[Category:balanced function]] [[Category:evasive function]] [[Category:even function]] [[Category:odd function]] [[Category:Noise sensitive function]]

Latest revision as of 10:02, 20 March 2022

Definition

The [math]n[/math]-variable parity function is the Boolean function [math]f:\{-1,1\}^n\to\{-1,1\}[/math] defined by [math]f(x)=x_1 \cdot x_2 \cdot \ldots \cdot x_n[/math]. In other words, [math]f(x)=1[/math] if and only if the number of ones in the vector [math]x\in\{-1,1\}^n[/math] is odd.

The name "parity" can also mean that the parity of only some [math]k[/math] of the [math]n[/math] bits is checked.

Properties

  • Parity only depends on the number of ones and is therefore a symmetric Boolean function.
  • The decision tree complexity of the parity function is [math]D(f)=n[/math].
  • Over [math]\{-1,1\}[/math], the representation of the parity function is exactly the monomial [math]x_1 x_2 \ldots x_n[/math]. Thus all of its Fourier mass rests on the highest level.
  • The n-variable parity function and its negation are the only Boolean functions for which all disjunctive normal forms have the maximal number of 2 n − 1 monomials of length n and all conjunctive normal forms have the maximal number of 2 n − 1 clauses of length n. [1]
  • Parity is not in AC0: A constant-depth Boolean circuit must have super-polynomial size in order to represent the parity function. [2] In fact, a circuit of depth [math]d[/math] must have size [math]\exp n^{\Theta (\frac{1}{d-1})}[/math] in order to exactly compute parity. This is tight: there exists a circuit of this size which computes parity. [3] [4]
    • Parity cannot even be approximated in AC0: A circuit of depth [math]d[/math] and size [math]S[/math] can only have a correlation of [math]2^{-c_d n / (\log S)^{d-1} }[/math] with parity. [5]
  • Parity over [math]n[/math] bits is odd when [math]n[/math] is odd, and even when [math]n[/math] is even.
  • Parity has nearest neighbor complexity bounded by [math]NN(f) \geq n+1[/math]. It has the maximal Boolean nearest-neighbor complexity, [math]BNN(f) = 2^n[/math]. [6]

References

  1. Ingo Wegener, Randall J. Pruim, Complexity Theory, 2005, Template:Isbn, p. 260
  2. Furst, Saxe, and Sipser Parity, Circuits, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy, 1984.
  3. J. Håstad, Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits, in Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’86, New York, ACM, 1986, pp. 6–20.
  4. A. C-C. Yao, Separating the polynomial-time hierarchy by oracles , in Proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS ’85, 1985, pp. 1–10
  5. J. Håstad, On the Correlation of Parity and Small-Depth Circuits, SIAM J. Comput., 43(5), 1699–1708.
  6. Péter Hajnal, Zhihao Liu, György Turán, Nearest neighbor representations of Boolean functions, Theorem 10, Proposition 3