Difference between revisions of "Volatility"

From Boolean Zoo
Jump to: navigation, search
(Properties)
(Properties)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* If a sequence <math>f_n</math> is tame with respect to <math>p_n</math>, then it is [[noise stability | noise stable]] with respect to <math>p_n</math>. <ref>Johan Jonasson, Jeffrey E. Steif, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414916000648 Volatility of Boolean functions], Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Proposition 1.13</ref>
 
* If a sequence <math>f_n</math> is tame with respect to <math>p_n</math>, then it is [[noise stability | noise stable]] with respect to <math>p_n</math>. <ref>Johan Jonasson, Jeffrey E. Steif, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414916000648 Volatility of Boolean functions], Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Proposition 1.13</ref>
 
* If a sequence <math>f_n</math> is [[noise sensitivity|noise sensitive]] with respect to <math>p_n</math>, then it is volatile with respect to <math>p_n</math>. <ref>Johan Jonasson, Jeffrey E. Steif, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414916000648 Volatility of Boolean functions], Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Proposition 1.17</ref>
 
* If a sequence <math>f_n</math> is [[noise sensitivity|noise sensitive]] with respect to <math>p_n</math>, then it is volatile with respect to <math>p_n</math>. <ref>Johan Jonasson, Jeffrey E. Steif, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414916000648 Volatility of Boolean functions], Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Proposition 1.17</ref>
 +
* The expected number of sign switches satisfies <math>\mathbb{E}[C] = \sum_i \mathrm{Inf}_i^{p}(f)</math>. In particular, for <math>p=1/2</math>, the expected number of switches is equal to the unbiased total influence. <ref>Johan Jonasson, Jeffrey E. Steif, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414916000648 Volatility of Boolean functions], Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Proposition 1.19</ref>
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 12:20, 1 November 2020

Definition

Let [math]p \in [0,1][/math] and [math]X(t) \in \{-1,1\}^n[/math] be a continuous-time Markov process where each entry [math]X_i(t)[/math] jumps from 0 to 1 with rate [math]p[/math], from 1 to 0 with rate [math]1-p[/math], and is independent of everything else. We assume that X(0) starts at the stationary measure, i.e is 1 with probability [math]p[/math] and 0 with probability [math]1-p[/math]. Given a Boolean function [math]f:\{-1,1\}^n \to \{-1,1\}[/math], we can count how many times the continuous-time process [math]f(X(t))[/math] changes sign during the interval [math]t\in[0,1][/math]. Denote this number by C.

A sequence of Boolean functions [math]f_n[/math] is said to be volatile if [math]C_n \to \infty[/math] in distribution.

A sequence of Boolean functions [math]f_n[/math] is said to be tame if [math]C_n[/math] is tight (i.e for every [math]\varepsilon \gt 0[/math], there is a [math]k[/math] such that [math]\mathbb{P}[C_n \geq k] \lt \varepsilon[/math] for [math]n[/math] large enough).

A sequence of Boolean functions [math]f_n[/math] is said to be lame if [math]\mathbb{P}[C_n = 0] \to 1 [/math].

Lameness is a special case of tameness.

Properties

  • If a sequence [math]f_n[/math] is tame with respect to [math]p_n[/math], then it is noise stable with respect to [math]p_n[/math]. [1]
  • If a sequence [math]f_n[/math] is noise sensitive with respect to [math]p_n[/math], then it is volatile with respect to [math]p_n[/math]. [2]
  • The expected number of sign switches satisfies [math]\mathbb{E}[C] = \sum_i \mathrm{Inf}_i^{p}(f)[/math]. In particular, for [math]p=1/2[/math], the expected number of switches is equal to the unbiased total influence. [3]

References

  1. Johan Jonasson, Jeffrey E. Steif, Volatility of Boolean functions, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Proposition 1.13
  2. Johan Jonasson, Jeffrey E. Steif, Volatility of Boolean functions, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Proposition 1.17
  3. Johan Jonasson, Jeffrey E. Steif, Volatility of Boolean functions, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Proposition 1.19